One might think that metaphors belong in poetry and literature. We tend to see them as decorative language; colorful ways of expressing ideas that could just as easily be said plainly. George Lakoff and Mark Johnson’s book Metaphors We Live By makes a good case to think otherwise. 

Their argument is that metaphors are not simply ways of speaking. They’re ways of thinking.

Human beings understand much of reality through metaphor. We take things that are abstract, complicated, or difficult to grasp and interpret them through things that are familiar and concrete. Over time, these metaphors become so common that we stop noticing them. Yet they continue to shape how we perceive the world.

Consider the phrase “winning an argument.” We attack points. We defend positions. We shoot down ideas. We gain ground. We lose ground. The underlying metaphor is simple: argument is war. The significance is not that we speak this way. The significance is that we often behave this way. If argument is war, then the goal becomes victory. The other person becomes an opponent. The conversation becomes a battlefield.

Imagine how differently society might function if our dominant metaphor was argument as exploration, or argument as collaboration.

We see the same pattern everywhere: Time is money. Life is a journey. Knowledge is light. Organizations are machines. Communities are networks. Nations are families. And these metaphors shape how problems are defined and how solutions are pursued. What makes this idea particularly important is that every metaphor illuminates some aspects of reality while obscuring others. A machine metaphor highlights efficiency, predictability, and control. It tends to overlook emotion, culture, relationships, and meaning. A garden metaphor highlights growth, stewardship, seasons, adaptation, and care. It draws attention to entirely different aspects of the same reality.

Whether we realize it or not, this insight has profound implications for social change.

Many people assume that changing society is primarily about changing policies, systems, or institutions. Those things matter. Yet beneath every institution lies a story. Beneath every story lies a metaphor. And the metaphor often determines what people believe is possible.

If society is viewed as a marketplace, people begin to think like consumers. If society is viewed as a machine, people begin to think like components. If society is viewed as a community, people begin to think like neighbors.

The battle for culture is often a battle between competing metaphors.

This idea resonates deeply with my own work. Much of what I find myself doing is offering alternative metaphors for understanding human life. Community as infrastructure. Stewardship instead of control. A social garden instead of a social machine. Money as a claim on value rather than value itself. These are more than differences in wording. They’re different lenses through which people can view the world.

That may be the most important lesson from Metaphors We Live By. Human beings rarely act on facts alone. Facts must be organized into meaning. Meaning is often carried by stories. Stories are built upon metaphors. Change the metaphor, and over time you may change the story.

Change the story, and eventually you may change the culture.


One thought worth reflecting on as you think through this idea: Metaphors We Live By provides a bridge between several themes we’ve been exploring together recently: memeplexes, culture-building, stewardship, community infrastructure, and the idea of “beating a drum” rather than trying to engineer society from the top down.

People rarely adopt a new worldview because they were presented with better data. More often, they adopt a new worldview because they were given a better story. And underneath every enduring story is usually a metaphor that feels intuitively true.

When we think of ourselves as “tenders of the social garden,” we’re doing more than creating a memorable phrase. We’re inviting people to see community, leadership, and social change through a different lens. Gardens require cultivation, patience, maintenance, seasons, and many hands. Once someone accepts that metaphor, a whole set of assumptions follows naturally. That may be why some ideas spread while others never leave the white paper stage. The successful ones often provide a metaphor that ordinary people can carry around in their heads and repeat to others.

In that sense, what I’ve often described as a memeplex may be understood as a constellation of reinforcing metaphors, stories, symbols, rituals, and practices that help people make sense of the world.

A movement begins when enough people start seeing reality through the same lens.

Conceptual Metaphor in Everyday Language

The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor

Metaphors We Think With: The Role of Metaphor in Reasoning

Mapping the brain’s metaphor circuitry: metaphorical thought in everyday reason

A Brief Outline of “Standard” Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Some Outstanding Issues

Addendum: Frames, Metaphors, and the Stories We Live By

If metaphors are the building blocks of thought, then frames are the structures built from those blocks.

George Lakoff’s work on framing can be understood as a natural extension of the ideas introduced in Metaphors We Live By. Metaphors help us understand individual concepts. Frames organize entire areas of reality. They determine what we notice, what we overlook, and what kinds of solutions seem reasonable. A metaphor such as “society is a machine” does more than provide a colorful description. It creates a frame. Once society is viewed as a machine, efficiency becomes a virtue. Control becomes important. Experts become mechanics. Problems are understood as malfunctions to be repaired.

A different metaphor produces a different frame.

If society is viewed as a garden, the emphasis shifts toward stewardship, cultivation, adaptation, seasons, and care. Human beings become gardeners rather than mechanics. Social problems become conditions to be improved rather than defects to be fixed.

The facts may remain unchanged. The frame alters how those facts are interpreted.

This is why movements are rarely built on facts alone. Facts matter, but people make sense of facts through stories, and stories are often rooted in metaphors and frames. And the battle for culture is frequently a contest between competing ways of seeing the world. Viewed through this lens, many social movements are attempts to establish new frames. They introduce new language, new symbols, and new stories that help people interpret reality differently. Once a new frame takes hold, people begin to notice evidence that supports it, and new possibilities emerge.

For those seeking to influence culture, this may be one of the most important lessons from Lakoff’s work. Lasting change often begins long before policies are rewritten or institutions are reformed. It begins when people start seeing the world through a different metaphor and, in doing so, adopt a different frame for understanding their place within it.

Join us in making the world a better place. You’ll be glad that you did. Cheers, friends.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *