For as long as people have lived together, they have traded things. A fish for a net. A chicken for some cloth. A promise for peace. Before the accountant’s ledger and before the banker’s vault, there was simply the lived reality of needing something you didn’t have, and offering something you did. You could call that barter. You could also call it neighborliness. Or survival.
At some point, academics decided that money had to come from something grand. David Graeber, bless him, took a hatchet to the old story of barter evolving into coinage. He pointed instead to systems of credit, to the long memory of debt, to obligations that could not be forgotten and could only be paid with something heavier than silver; something like remorse, or blood.
And he may be right in part. It’s true that people kept track. It’s true that someone had to settle accounts when a life was taken or a wrong was done. But why must we search for a single origin, as if money erupted into the world with a thunderclap?
Occam’s razor, ever the philosopher’s broom, brushes away the drama. What if the answer is as ordinary as it is profound? What if money, like language or laughter, simply emerged because it had to? People exchanged things. Then they exchanged more things. Then they forgot who owed what. Then someone scratched a tally on a bone, or carved it into a temple wall, or wove it into a basket. And slowly, meaning began to cling to objects. Value attached itself to tokens, just as memory attaches itself to places. Not suddenly. Not all at once. But gradually, like a tide creeping in.
One might bring up the temple offerings, the tribute to kings, the gifts left at the feet of stone gods with vacant eyes. These too were exchanges, although cloaked in reverence. The grain given to a pharaoh was not so different from the sheep given to a neighbor; each was a transaction, marked by obligation or hope. And when societies swelled, and neighbors no longer knew one another by name, these exchanges needed a shared language. Thus, money.
We do ourselves a disservice, perhaps, in seeking a single spark. There was no monetary Big Bang. There was instead a slow burn; a fire that passed from hearth to hearth, from hand to hand. Money did not descend from the heavens nor rise from a philosopher’s brain. It grew alongside us, a shadow of our social lives. Wherever people gathered, there was the impulse to measure and to balance, to remember and to assign worth.
In this light, money is less an invention than a habit. It is the human urge to keep track, made visible. To call it evil or divine is to give it too much power. It is a tool, like a cup or a calendar. It can hold water or wine or poison, depending on how it is used.
So yes, barter existed. So did blood debts. So did temple tithes and kingly taxes and the quiet generosity between strangers. Out of all this, money emerged. Not as a replacement for trust, but as an extension of it. Not as a betrayal of morality, but as a mechanism for memory.
And perhaps that is why we are still uneasy around it. Money remembers what we would rather forget. It recalls the labor, the loss, the compromise. It sits there in our wallets or bank accounts, humming with invisible history. And like all things human, it carries both grace and guilt in its folds.
There is no need to search for its beginning as if it were a crime scene. The origin of money is the origin of us, not in theory, but in practice. In the quiet, daily business of being human.
Join us in making the world a better place – you’ll be glad that you did. Cheers friends.